All in One SEO alternatives: six plugins measured on the same site

Every other plugin we tested is lighter than All in One SEO, so the question is which trade you want. The SEO Framework is the cheapest (+8.0 ms and 0 queries against All in One SEO's +53.5 ms and 22) and prints more schema. If you want to keep a full dashboard, Hydrogen SEO and Yoast are the closer matches.

Figures are from our seven-plugin benchmark, free versions at defaults, one plugin at a time on WordPress 7.1. We build Hydrogen SEO, one of the options below.

Why people look for an alternative

All in One SEO posted the highest cost in every cost category it entered. The specific reasons people leave:

  • Server cost. +53.5 ms of PHP time, +14.5 MB of memory and +22 queries per request, all the highest in the field, plus the largest <head> growth (6,668 bytes).
  • Admin weight. A 511 KB dashboard, about four times bare WordPress, and 130 files (3,543 KB) in the block editor.
  • Tables and leftovers. Nine custom tables, more than any other plugin, and deactivating it released none of its 14.6 KB of autoloaded options.
  • Thin defaults in places. 6 Open Graph and 3 X tags, the thinnest social output of the major plugins, and no image entries in the free sitemap.

Reasons to stay: it is approachable, with a guided setup and clear screens. It stamped lastmod on all 73 sitemap URLs, printed 8 schema types and generates meta descriptions by default. It belongs to a large product family, which some site owners value. If your hosting has plenty of headroom and you or your clients like its interface, those are fair reasons. If you do leave, migrate before uninstalling, because its per-post data lives in its own tables.

  1. The SEO Framework

    +8 ms front-end, +0 queries, 0 custom tables, 9 JSON-LD types

    The largest possible cost reduction: +8.0 ms, zero queries, no tables, and 77.6 KB in the editor against 3,543 KB. It printed more schema (9 types in 1,881 bytes against 8 in 4,544) and more social tags. Its sitemap is smaller, a flat 51 URLs without archives. See All in One SEO vs The SEO Framework.

  2. Hydrogen SEO

    +12.9 ms front-end, +1 queries, 0 custom tables, 10 JSON-LD types

    Our plugin. It keeps a full dashboard, which matters if you liked having screens, while adding +12.9 ms and 1 query with no tables. It printed 10 schema types, 10 Open Graph and 5 X tags, and a sitemap with all 40 images and full lastmod. It is Beta, and its 700 KB editor bundle is heavier than the lightest options. It imports All in One SEO and Pro data; see Hydrogen SEO vs All in One SEO.

  3. Slim SEO

    +10 ms front-end, +2 queries, 0 custom tables, 10 JSON-LD types

    The smallest footprint in the field (1.4 MB package, +1,649 head bytes, no tables) with 10 schema types and a sitemap with images. It adds no admin menus at all, so it is the opposite of All in One SEO's guided interface. It left 23 sitemap URLs without lastmod. See All in One SEO vs Slim SEO.

  4. Yoast SEO

    +39 ms front-end, +3 queries, 6 custom tables, 12 JSON-LD types

    The move for people who want another mainstream name. It costs less (+39.0 ms, 3 queries, six tables, a 150 KB dashboard) and prints more: 12 schema types and a 75-URL sitemap with images. It prints no meta description by default, and its 4,160 KB editor is heavier than All in One SEO's. See Yoast vs All in One SEO.

  5. SEOPress

    +24.5 ms front-end, +1 queries, 1 custom tables, 0 JSON-LD types

    Less than half the PHP time, one query, one table and 217 KB in the editor, with a restrained admin and fuller social tags. It shares All in One SEO's deactivation problem (nothing released) and its free version printed no schema. See All in One SEO vs SEOPress.

  6. Rank Math

    +36.1 ms front-end, +16 queries, 6 custom tables, 6 JSON-LD types

    Lighter than All in One SEO (+36.1 ms, 16 queries, six tables) with the fullest social tags we measured. It is still one of the heavier plugins, and its sitemap left out images and some archives at defaults. Choose it if you want more configuration, not less weight.

All seven, measured

MeasuredAll in One SEO 5.0.1.1The SEO Framework 5.1.4Hydrogen SEO 0.0.18Slim SEO 4.10.1Yoast SEO 28.4SEOPress 10.2Rank Math 1.0.278
Front-end PHP time added+53.5 ms+8 ms+12.9 ms+10 ms+39 ms+24.5 ms+36.1 ms
Peak memory added+14.5 MB+2 MB+4.5 MB+2 MB+10.5 MB+6.5 MB+8.5 MB
Database queries added+22+0+1+2+3+1+16
Hooks registered+100+8+22+51+187+114+155
<head> bytes added+6,668+3,821+4,259+1,649+5,656+2,380+4,965
Meta description by defaultYesYesYesYesNoYesYes
JSON-LD types printed8910101206
Open Graph / X tags6 / 310 / 510 / 511 / 210 / 510 / 611 / 8
Sitemap URLs listed73517273755859
Sitemap image entries00404040400
lastmod coverage73 / 7351 / 5172 / 7250 / 7374 / 7550 / 5859 / 59
Custom database tables9000616
Autoloaded options added+14.6 KB+4.2 KB+0.4 KB-0.2 KB+13.6 KB+3.6 KB+11.6 KB
Plugin package size24.4 MB2.9 MB4.6 MB1.4 MB21 MB11.7 MB15.1 MB
Block editor assets130 files, 3,543 KB25 files, 77.6 KB2 files, 700.4 KB14 files, 187.7 KB48 files, 4,160 KB17 files, 217 KB24 files, 1,792 KB
After deactivationNo reduction: 14.5 KB still autoloadingReleases everything (exact baseline)+0.2 KB left autoloadingReleases everything+2.6 KB left autoloading, 6 tables remainNo reduction at all+11.0 KB still autoloading

Measured on one WordPress 7.1 install (PHP 8.2, MySQL 8.0, Twenty Twenty-Five, 40 posts), each plugin alone with default settings, against a no-plugin baseline. Bold marks the better number in each row. Full method: how we tested.

Common questions

What is the best lightweight alternative to All in One SEO?

The SEO Framework, in our benchmark: +8.0 ms and 0 queries against +53.5 ms and 22, with no custom tables against nine.

Do I need to keep All in One SEO installed to migrate?

Keep it installed until the import is done. Its per-post SEO data lives in its own tables, which can be lost if you uninstall first. Hydrogen SEO's importer works with it deactivated; check other importers' requirements.

Is there an alternative with a similar dashboard?

Yoast, Rank Math, Hydrogen SEO and SEOPress all have full settings interfaces. The SEO Framework's is minimal, and Slim SEO adds no admin menus.